The concept of soulmaking is the core of hicks theodicy. In my opinion, it has the disadvantage that the structure of the paper may be not clear but it has the advantage that it put all theodicy in his implicated assumption. It is significant that the actual irenaean theodicy does not posit such a purpose for the universe. This theory allows people to have optimism through suffering and gives value to the growth that follows suffering.
Suffering then is not exactly pointless or there is no such thing as pointless suffering since it helps perfect man, which is the express purpose of what hick calls soulmaking. In its original form, it is probably fair to say that irenaeus theodicy is at least as abhorrent as augustines to the modern reader. Hicks basic principle is that we live in a soul making universe. One attracting attention in the past few decades is the irenaean theodicy, as developed by john hick and more recently by richard swinburne. John hicks irenaeanevolutionary theodicy recasts iranaeans pedagogical theodicy in an evolutionary context. The soul making theodicy is the theory that god designed the world to prepare mankind for their salvation that is ultimately becoming apart of the marriage between himself and the church. Of all the issues in the philosophy of religion, the problem of reconciling belief in god with evil in the world arguably commands more attention than any other. Hick has identified with a branch of theodicy that he calls irenaean theodicy or the soul making defense.
Irenaean soulmaking theodicy extract from the problem of evil. In his theodicy, hick not only claims that there is no such thing as pointless suffering in the world, but that despite there being evil in the world, god still exists and he is still kind and omnipotent since the. As said before, the cosmos is made to be a vale of soul making. In direct contrast to william rowe is the soul making theodicy put forward by john hicks, a 20 th century philosopher. Irenaeus soul making theodicy stands up rather better against the criticism that heaven is a compensation not a justification.
As kevin diller puts it, unlike the free will theodicy, in a soul making theodicy god desires evil as a means. Irenaean theodicy is a soulmaking theodicy which proposes that whilst evil is the consequence of human free will and disobedience, god is still partly responsible for evil and suffering in the world. The third part in a series on the problem of evil designed for people studying philosophy of religion at asa2 level. It derives from a combination of the greek words theos god and dike justice and is used to signify any justification of gods actions in the face of suffering and evil. The soul making or irenaean theodicy is named after the 2nd century french theologian irenaeus, whose ideas were adopted in eastern christianity.
In this essay, leslie allan considers the effectiveness of the counterarguments advanced by theist philosopher, clement dore, to two key objections to the soulmaking theodicy. Irenaeus ideas did not become popular teachings in the way that augustines did. The result is a free will theodicy with an irenaean or soul making twist. Typical to variations of the irenaean theodicy is the notion that the present world is the greatest possible world, or the best of all possible worlds. Problem of evil responses introduction to philosophy. In other words, god allows suffering so that human souls might grow or develop towards maturation. For here, as in the case of animals, there is no soul making purpose that is served.
What are the differences between augustinian theodicy and. The irenaean theodicy isnt an adequate solution to the. May 02, 2008 episode 2 of the god squad, as they tackle the irenaean theodicy for your educational benefit. Only in such a world, where obstacles abound and the chance of flubbing it exists, can there be any positive growth toward god. He perceived gods declaration in the book of genesis that his creation was good to mean that. According to the irenaean theodicy, creation involves two different stages. Strengths and weakesses of john hicks theodicy flashcards. Lesson aim to learn about a different solution to the problem of evil and suffering. The best reason to read evil and the god of love, the classic treatment of the problem of evil by john hick, is that he does a good to excellent job of summarizing various theodicies, including those of augustine and of irenaeus, as well as the classic freewill defense. I should let you know that i know next to nothing about the topic. A comparison of augustinian theodicy and irenaean theodicy.
It is to answer the question of why a good god permits the manifestation of evil, thus resolving the issue of the problem of evil. Jun, 20 john hick is a modern theologian who developed his theodicy based on an argument originally put forward by st irenaeus. Phillipss book, the problem of evil and the problem of god london. Soulmaking theodicy the history of evil from the midtwentieth. As such, the irenaean theodicy is sometimes referred to as the soul making theodicy, a phrase taken from the poet john keats. If god is allloving, allknowing, and allpowerful, then why are there horrid natural realities like cancers and earthquakes, as well as moral evils like rape, murder, and genocides. God gave us free will so that we could partake in this spiritual quest for heaven. Theodicy in the book of ezekiel and also in jeremiah 31.
Creator which justifies even the long travail of the soul making process. Gods purpose for humanity is soul making so that everyone can get the rewards of becoming children of god. What is the relevance of such circumstances in humes formulation of the problem of evil. The main point is stated at the beginning and at the endthe soul that sins shall dieand is explicated by a case history of a family traced through three generations. Third, in comparison to the augustinian theodicy being a soul deciding theodicy, the irenaean theodicy is a soul making theodicy. As such, the irenaean theodicy is sometimes referred to as the soulmaking theodicy, a phrase taken from the poet john keats. Augustine, in his book confessions, recognised this problem.
The soulmaking theodicy is the theory that god designed the world to prepare mankind for their salvation that is ultimately becoming apart of the marriage between himself and the church. Published on nov 11, 2018 the irenaean theodicy attempts to argue that the existence of an all loving, all powerful god is completely possible with the existence of evil. I suppose support for this irenaean theodicy might come from. The irenaean theodicy is a christian theodicy it defends the probability of an omnipotent and. John hick 19222012 internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Apr 15, 2014 the third part in a series on the problem of evil designed for people studying philosophy of religion at asa2 level. Some theodicies also address the evidential problem of evil by attempting to make the existence of an allknowing, allpowerful and allgood or omnibenevolent god consistent with the existence of evil or.
To make humans perfect would take away their freedom. Study strengths and weakesses of john hicks theodicy flashcards from hal ferriers class online, or in. Besides the distinctions mentioned in the above passages, the augustinian theodicy and irenaean theodicy are often compared by people in many other aspects. The irenaean theodicy isnt an adequate solution to the problem of evil. During this stage hick also developed his irenaean soulmaking theodicy in. Since god is omniscient, he knows that morallyperfected humans will look. Hick evil and the god of love 289295, 340345, 369372. This idea sits well with people who do believe in the creation story. Thirdly, the soul making theodicy also provides no account of the suffering that young, innocent children endure, either because of terrible diseases, or at the hands of adults. In his theodicy, hick not only claims that there is no such thing as pointless suffering in the world, but that despite there being evil in the world, god still exists and he is still kind. List of books and articles about theodicy online research.
Soulmaking and souldeciding good, evil and suffering. In part one i gave an introduction to the problem of evil. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. This theodicy suggests that humans do, in a way, agree to their own sufferings but retrospectively, once they have become in gods likeness. The augustinian theodicy was first distinguished as a form of theodicy by john hick in evil and the god of love, written in 1966, in which he classified augustines theodicy and its subsequent developments as augustinian. Hick contrasts irenaeus views with the later theodicy of augustine of hippo. It has been discussed by john hick, and the irenaean theodicy asserts that evil and suffering are necessary for spiritual growth, for man to discover his soul, and god allows evil for spiritual growth. He believes that soul making may continue in the next world and natural evil such as earthquakes and famine are godgiven opportunities for people to develop.
Hick sees the first phase of god making humankind in his image as the culmination of the evolutionary process, whereby a creature has been evolved who has the possibility of existing in conscious fellowship with god. A simplification of this view states that suffering exists as a means of spiritual development. Evil as part of irenaean theory is not a punishment but a tool to for soul making john hick. One of the principal critics of the augustinian theodicy is f. Through his writings he helped to establish the canon of scripture.
Theodicy addresses the evidential problem of evil by attempting to make the existence of an allknowing, allpowerful and allgood or omnibenevolent god consistent with the existence of evil or suffering in the world. Challenges to soulmaking theodicy in john hicks paper, all the above theodicies are grouped in the category of soulmaking only. Quizlet flashcards, activities and games help you improve your grades. And so sovereign providence has often produced a remarkable effectevil men making other evil men good. Theodicy, in its most common form, attempts to answer the question why a good god permits the manifestation of evil. Again, if god cannot make the zoe outright, but can only create bios and wait for its. John hicks irenaean evolutionary theodicy recasts iranaeans pedagogical theodicy in an evolutionary context.
If gods love was freely given, it would be of less value. In the book he addresses a variety of philosophical issues in an extensive development and discussion of christian theology as it is relevant to theodicy. The problem of evil stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Four basic approaches to theodicy justifications for evil in the world are presentedaugustinian, irenaean, hicks irenaean evolutionary, and process theology. The irenaean theodicy 202 the augustinian theodicy is a soul deciding theodicy. Irenaean soulmaking theodicy extract from the problem. This means that augustinian theodicy is concerned with judgment. In making sin, suffering, and evil necessary for human growth and maturity, it makes something that is fundamentally irrationalevil per seinto something rational. Hick acknowledges a number of comparisons between the augustinian type of theodicy and his irenaean soulmaking type of theodicy, such as gods share in the responsibility for the existence of evil, but he finds the irenaean type more plausible and theologically satisfying. The irenaean theodicy is also known as a soul making theodicy. The irenaean theodicy, named after the church father and recently popularized by john hick, sees our world as an arena of soul making, that is, a place where free but immature creatures can grow up into moral and spiritual maturity.
The soul making theodicy, for example, is simply the view that evil is justified as a necessary condition of soul development, but if a proponent of this theodicy goes on to claim that suffering should be used for personal gain, this is a failing of that individual rather than a view sanctioned by the theodicy itself. Is the magnitude of suffering really necessary for soul making. In evil and the god of love professor hick provides perhaps the most comprehensive and insightful philosophical examination of theodicy in contemporary time. Scm press, 2004 deserves a response from the among those of his contemporaries whose work in this area he so severely criticised. Adam had the image of god, but not the content of god, likeness. Irenaeus lived and wrote at a time when many christian beliefs were still being debated and decided upon. Irenaeas distinguished between the image and the likeness of god. The purpose of the world is to create people to number one, no god and number two to love god. The purpose of this essay is to outline the irenaean theodicy and what he believed was the purpose for evil and suffering in detail with some strengths and weaknesses, the essay will also include modern theodicies which were devised by swinburne and another by hick. Challenges to soul making theodicy in john hicks paper, all the above theodicies are grouped in the category of soul making only. According to hick, the divine purpose could not be forwarded in a world that was designed as a. While both employ the creation account of genesis, they draw drasti.
Hicks theodicy is unable to explain the inconsistent distribution of suffering. He lumped together as the theodicists a variety of contemporaries covering a range of views richard swinburne, stephen davis, alvin plantinga, marilyn adams, robert adams, and myself. I want you to answer some questions for my philosophy exam the questions are essay questions you should read based on only uploaded files that are. To set the stage for hicks irenaean theodicy, one must first rehearse. The term theodicy was coined by german philosopher and mathematician gottfried wilhelm leibniz 16461716 in an essay written in 1710. The book that irenaeus wrote on this on the monarchy of god has been lost, so we only. Rethinking john hicks theodicy, the journal of religion 90, no. Episode 2 of the god squad, as they tackle the irenaean theodicy for your educational benefit. Dec 01, 2007 quite different from the augustinian theodicy, the irenaean theodicy which was created by saint irenaeas 202 ad and later developed by john hicks and richard swinburne doesnt see the world as created allgood and describes an almost opposite process compared with the augustinian theodicy. Hick acknowledges a number of comparisons between the augustinian type of theodicy and his irenaean soul making type of theodicy, such as gods share in the responsibility for the existence of evil, but he finds the irenaean type more plausible and theologically satisfying. He argued that the world exists as a vale of soul making, and that suffering and evil must therefore occur.
There are modern theodicies as told by hick and swinburne, hick stated that the theodicy was soulmaking and that each of us had to be created an epistemic distance from god which is why there are people who believe he exists and some people disagree. The irenaean theodicy is also known as a soulmaking theodicy. Quite different from the augustinian theodicy, the irenaean theodicy which was created by saint irenaeas 202 ad and later developed by john hicks and richard swinburne doesnt see the world as created allgood and describes an almost opposite process compared with the augustinian theodicy. Irenaeus soulmaking theodicy irenaeus stated that god made humans imperfect and is therefore partly responsible for the existence of evil.
Moving from a comparison of the irenaean and augustinian traditions in theodicy to a powerfully original critique of hicks influential soul making theodicy, geivett presents a richly developed natural theology drawing on contemporary scientific opinion in support of an ex nihilo creation. There is one major worry, however, with the soul making theodicy. Therein he describes what has been called an irenaean theodicy which claims that god permits moral and natural evil in order to achieve certain salutary soul making e. Irenaeus successfully defends god against charges of creating or allowing evil and suffering. What are the differences between augustinian theodicy and irenaean theodicy. Irenaeus theodicy avoids the issue of a perfect creation turning away from god whilst also allowing for freewill and gods omni characteristics.
As mentioned before, the main objective of pain and suffering is to help mankind become perfect. Why is irenaeus theodicy often referred to as the soul making theodicy. This book is an appraisal of hicks work on the specific topic of theodicy his effort to. In this essay, leslie allan considers the effectiveness of the counterarguments advanced by theist philosopher, clement dore, to two key objections to the soul making theodicy. His theodicy is more concerned with the development of humanity. Hick distinguished between the augustinian theodicy, which attempts to clear god of all responsibility for evil, based on human free will, and the irenaean. Irenaeus theodicy allows for the humanity to recognise the value of a relationship with god. Its information on the history of the problem makes it a worthwhile read. Major work adversus omnes haereses detailed attack on gnosticism. Gods aim when he created the world was to eventually make humans flawless, in his likeness. The irenaean theodicy attempts to argue that the existence of an all loving, all powerful god is completely possible with the existence of evil. Moving from a comparison of the irenaean and augustinian traditions in. Mar 12, 2017 for irenaeus, life is less a vale of soul making than an annealing process, the human body being like iron quenched in fire and icy water to make it hard. In so far as hicks irenaean theodicy holds that fw is instrumental in soul making, i take it to be a form of the fwt.
Irenaeus never developed a full theodicy as such, but his approach represents that put forward in recent times by john hick. Two further consequences of hicks theodicy should be borne in mind here. For some, when they think they suffer injustice at the hands of the worst of men, burn with hatred for evil men, and being eager to be different from those they hate, have reformed and become virtuous. If suffering is essential to human development as hick suggests, then it is surely unfair that many people miss out on its benefits. James 24 james tells us to count the trials we face as joy, because it produces endurance which will make us perfect and complete, lacking in nothing. Irenaean theodicy is a soul making theodicy which proposes that whilst evil is the consequence of human free will and disobedience, god is still partly responsible for evil and suffering in the world. A soul making theodicy is applied by irenaeus, which means to move from the state of imperfection through moral struggle toward eventual completed humanization. Theodicy project gutenberg selfpublishing ebooks read. What is more supported in the bible, the irenaean or. In direct contrast to william rowe is the soulmaking theodicy put forward by john hicks, a 20 th century philosopher. Irenaeus successfully defends god against charges of. So if a person chooses to do a morally wrong act a consequence will follow.
420 906 460 621 1385 1391 548 9 723 1441 38 343 206 275 713 547 993 84 180 327 1361 908 979 150 700 397 1367 614 874 455 1133 310 540 527 451 934 880 1118 32 519